The world is a great big database and algorithmic wizards and mad data scientists are burning the midnight oil to mine the perplexing infinities of ubiquitous data points. Their goal is to put data to use to facilitate better governance, initiate pinpoint marketing campaigns, pursue revelatory academic research and improve the quality of service public agencies deliver to protect and serve communities. The convergence of Big Data, Cloud Computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) make this possible.
The earth is the mother of all relational databases. It’s six billion inhabitants track many billions of real time digital footprints across the face of the globe each and every day. Some footprints are readily apparent and easy to see. Facebook likes, credit card transactions, name and address lists, urgent Tweets and public records sparkle like alluvial diamonds; all easily plucked by data aggregators and sold to product marketers at astonishing profit margins. Other data points are less apparent, hidden or derived in the incessant hum of the ever listening, ever recording global cybersphere. These are the digital touch points we knowingly and unknowingly create with our interactions with the world wide web and the machines that live there.
It is estimated that there is over 20 billion smart machines that are fully integrated into our lives. These machines stay busy creating digital footprints; adding quantitative context to the quality of the human condition. EZ Passes, RFID tags, cell phone records, location tracking, energy meters, odometers, auto dashboard idiot lights, self diagnostic fault tolerant machines, industrial process controls, seismographic, air and water quality apparatuses and the streaming CBOT digital blips flash the milliseconds of a day in the life of John Q. Public. Most sentient beings pay little notice, failing to consider that someone somewhere is planting the imprints of our daily lives in mammoth disk farms. The webmasters, data engineers and information scientists are collecting, collating, aggregating, scoring and analyzing these rich gardens of data to harvest an accurate psychographic portrait of modernity.
The IoT is the term coined to describe the new digital landscape we inhabit. The ubiquitous nature of the internet, the continued rationalization of the digital economy into the fabric of society and the absolute dependency of daily life upon it, require deep consideration how it impacts civil liberties, governance, cultural vibrancy and economic well being.
The IoT is the next step in the development of the digital economy. By 2025 it is estimated that IoT will drive $6 Trillion in global economic activity. This anoints data and information as the loam of the modern global economy; no less significant than the arrival of discrete manufacturing at the dawn of industrial capitalism.
The time may come when a case may be made that user generated data is a commodity and should be considered a public domain natural resource; but today it is the province of digirati shamans entrusted to interpret the Rosetta Stones, gleaning deep understanding of the current reality while deriving high probability predictive futures. IoT is one of the prevailing drivers of global social development.
There is another critical economic and socio-political driver of the global economy. Small Mid-Sized Enterprises (SME) are the cornerstone of job creation in developed economies. They form the bedrock of subsistence and economic activity in lesser developed countries (LDC). They are the dynamic element of capitalism. SME led by courageous risk takers are the spearhead of capital formation initiatives. Politicians, bureaucrats and business pundits extol their entrepreneurial zeal and hope to channel their youthful energy in service to local and national political aspirations. The establishment of SME is a critical macroeconomic indicator of a country’s economic health and the wellspring of social wealth creation.
The World Bank/ IFC estimates that over 130 million registered SME inhabit the global economy. The definition of an SME varies by country. Generally an SME and MSME (Micro Small Mid Sized Enterprises) are defined by two measures, number of employees or annual sales. Micro enterprises are defined as employing less than 9 employees, small up to 100 employees and medium sized enterprises anywhere from 200 to 500 employees. Defining SMEs by sales scale in a similar fashion.
Every year millions of startup businesses replace the millions that have closed. The world’s largest economy United States boasts over 30 million SME and every year over one million small businesses close. The EU and OECD countries report similar statistics of the preponderance of SME and numbers of business closures.
The SME is a dynamic non homogeneous business segment. It is highly diverse in character, culture and business model heavily colored by local influence and custom. SME is overly sensitive to macroeconomic risk factors and market cyclicality. Risk is magnified in the SME franchise due to high concentration of risk factors. Over reliance on a limited set of key clients or suppliers, product obsolescence, competitive pressures, force majeure events, key employee risk, change management and credit channel dependencies are glaring risk factors magnified by business scale and market geographics.
In the United States, during the banking crisis the Federal Reserve was criticized for pursuing policies that favored large banking and capital market participants while largely ignoring SME. To mitigate contagion risk, The Federal Reserve quickly acted to pump liquidity into the banking sector to buttress the capital structure of SIFI (Systemically Important Financial Institutions). It was thought that a collateral benefit would be the stimulation of SME lending. This never occurred as SBA backed loans nosedived. Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner implemented the TARP and TALF programs to further strengthen the capital base of distressed banks as former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke pursued Quantitative Easing to transfer troubled mortgage backed securities onto Uncle Sams balance sheet to relieve financial institutions of these troubled assets. Some may argue that President Obama’s The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) helped the SME sector. The $800 billion stimulus was one third tax cuts, one third cash infusion to local governments and one third capital expenditures aimed at shovel ready infrastructure improvement projects. The scale of the ARRA was miniscule as compared to support rendered to banks and did little to halt the deteriorating macroeconomic conditions of the collapsing housing market, ballooning unemployment and rising energy prices severely stressing SME.
The EU offered no better. As the PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Spain) economies collapsed the European Central Bank forced draconian austerity measures on national government expenditures undermining key SME market sensitivities. On both sides of the Atlantic, the perception of a bifurcated central banking policy that favored TBTF Wall Street over the needs of an atomized SME segment flourished. The wedge between the speculative economy of Wall Street and the real economy on Main Street remains a festering wound.
In contrast to the approach of western central bankers, Asian Tigers, particularly Singapore have created a highly supportive environment for the incubation and development of SME. Banks offer comprehensive portfolios of financial products and SME advisory services. Government legislative programs highlight incubation initiatives linked to specific industry sectors. Developed economies have much to learn from these SME friendly market leaders.
The pressing issues concerning net neutrality, ecommerce tax policies, climate change and the recognition of Bitcoin as a valid commercial specie are critical developments that goes to the heart of a healthy global SME community. These emerging market events are benevolent business drivers for SME and concern grows that legislative initiatives are being drafted to codify advantages for politically connected larger enterprises.
Many view this as a manifestation of a broken political system, rife with protections of large well financed politically connected institutions. Undermining these entrenched corporate interests is the ascending digital paradigm promising to dramatically alter business as usual politics. Witness the role of social media in the Arab Spring, Barack Obama’s 2008 election or the decapitalization of the print media industry as clear signals of the the passing away of the old order of things. Social networking technologies and the democratization of information breaks down the ossified monopolies of knowledge access. These archaic ramparts are being gleefully overthrown by open collaborative initiatives levelling the playing field for all market participants.
This is where SMEIoT neatly converges. To effectively serve an efficient market, transparency and a contextual understanding of its innate dynamics are critical preconditions to market participation. The incubation of SME and the underwriting of capital formation initiatives from a myriad of providers will occur as information standards provide a level of transparency that optimally aligns risk and investment capital. SMEIoT will provide the insights to the sector for SME to grow and prosper while industry service providers engage SME within the context of a cooperative economic non-exploitative relationship.
This series will examine SME and how IoT will serve to transform and incubate the sector. We’ll examine the typology of the SME ecosystem, its risk characteristics and features. We’ll propose a metadata framework to model SME descriptors, attributes, risk factors and a scoring methodology. We’ll propose an SME portal, review the mission of Big Data and its indispensable role to create cooperative economic frameworks within the SME ecosystem. Lastly we’ll review groundbreaking work social scientists, legal scholars and digital frontier activists are proposing to address best governance practices and ethical considerations of Big Data collection, the protection of privacy rights, informed consent, proprietary content and standards of accountability.
SMEIoT coalesces at the intersection of social science, commerce and technology. History has aligned SMEIot building blocks to create the conditions for this exciting convergence. Wide participation of government agencies, academicians, business leaders, scientists and ethicists will be required to make pursuit of this science serve the greatest good.
This is the first in a series of articles on Big Data and SMEIoT . It originally appeared in Daftblogger eJournal. Next piece in series is scheduled to appear on Daftblogger eJournal within the next two weeks.
#smeiot #metasme #sum2llc #sme #office365 #mobileoffice #TARP #capitalformation #IoT #internetofthings #OECD #TBTF #Bitcoin #psychographics #smeportals #bigdata #informedconsent
July 9, 2014 Posted by riskrapper | banking, Bernanke, commerce, commercial, credit crisis, economics, ethics, Internet of Things, IoT, politics, risk management, SME, SMEIOT, Sum2, sustainability, TALF, TARP, Treasury | #bigdata, #Bitcoin, #capitalformation, #informedconsent, #internetofthings, #IoT, #metasme, #mobileoffice, #office365, #psychographics, #smeiot, #smeportals, #sum2llc, OECD, SME, TARP, TBTF | Leave a comment
Its official. The battle has been joined and America’s values are alive and well in the War Against Christmas. A lead news story on CNN this morning is of a family setting up a tent at the doorway of a Best Buy in Orlando. These intrepid people, steeped in wholesome pursuit of real family values have staked a claim to be first in line for the annual Black Friday deathcage match. These gladiators of consumer capitalism are toughing it out. They choose to courageously suffer the discomforts of the bleak concrete jungle. Their bivouac is a full week in advance of the day after Thanksgiving orgy of shopping that has become an annual rite of American’s unabashed prostration to consumer excess.
This family are truly free market heroes. They will be joined with armies of fellow patriots. Together they will tramp to the Malls of America armed with nothing more then a wallet full of limit challenged credit cards in their battle to stimulate demand for Chinese manufacturers and to thoroughly route the enemies warring against Christmas.
This family is unselfishly sacrificing quality family time. Each member will take turns standing post in this righteous encampment. This will allow other family members rest at home or go about the daily activities of civilian life. For these product purchasing patriots even Thanksgiving will need to be sacrificed at mammon’s alter so they can stand as vigilant sentinels guarding their place at the head of the Best Buy line. The thought of missing bargains or failing to secure the purchase of this years newest hot product due to an expired inventory is a fate just to terrible to contemplate.
This family clearly has their priorities strait. They are determined to satisfy the Christmas wishes of family and friends. These radical entitle-istes will not be denied their 10% discount on X Boxes and Ipods. This family will not rest until the mission to buy a Medal of Honor Black Ops or Mafia 2 “The City of Lost Heaven” video game for the special children in their lives is secured, wrapped and placed under the family’s silver coated Tannenbaum.
Like all thoughtful people this family will pause on Thanksgiving Day or sometime during their 168 hour vigil to express deep gratitude that their tent is much nicer then the typical residences recently springing up on the outskirts of Port-Au-Prince.
Soldier on you bold armies of the night. Solider on.
You Tube Video: Tenting Tonight
Risk: values, culture, priorities
November 20, 2010 Posted by riskrapper | business, commercial, culture, ethics, holiday, religion, seasons, values | Best Buy, Black Friday, Mafia Car Theaft II, Medal of Honor Black Ops, Port Au Prince, Tenting Tonight, Thanksgiving Day, War Against Christmas | Leave a comment
There is this program that runs on the WE Cable Network. It’s called Crossing Over with Jonathan Edwards. Jonathan Edwards is a psychic medium. He stands in front of a live gathering of 75 people and tunes into psychic vibes emanating through the audience. The vibes are messages from deceased loved ones who have crossed over the Acheron. The dead are keen to communicate warnings, good wishes and assurances to assist living loved ones on how to navigate the tricky vicissitudes of life. During the show, Jonathan walks about the room picking up on celestial chatter and begins to relay and interpret a soliloquy of the dead like a macabre game of supernatural telephone. Jonathan Edwards asks his audience to suspend all disbelief as he bestrides the nexus of the metaphysical spirit world and the pedestrian reality that most earthlings inhabit.
The most common messages the dead channel through Jonathan seek to absolve the anxiety and guilt of the tormented living. Crossing Over is popular because it offers its audience an absolution, confirms personal cosmology and rationalizes the pursuit of desires by affirming the consequences of decisions as a self fulfilling prophecy. It safely places its audience in a self validating cosmic echo chamber. Its an ongoing morality tale with only happy endings and unfortunately only a tenuous connection to authenticity and objective truth.
The state of the news media industry is very much like Crossing Over. The Forth Estate once thought of as an objective arbiter, information dispersant and truth seeking medium it is now chosen and consumed as a branded version of reality.
The devastating earthquake that buried Haitians in heaps of rubble unleashed global battalions of news teams to cover the event. Many of the news crews from large established networks beat first responders to the scene. In some cases the arrival of news teams actually held up the arrival of rescue teams and supplies because the airfield and crowed airspace could not accommodate all the traffic. The news teams were forced to hole up at the airport because blocked roads prohibited them from going anywhere. I recall Robin Roberts and the GMA News team dodging fork lifts and supply trucks left with nothing more to do then to urgently interview themselves. Correspondents were reduced to ghoulishly opining about the tragedy while eagerly mugging for the cameras with contorted faces to portray the human tragedy unfolding beyond the range of their cameras.
GMA’s presence added nothing and in fact inhibited rescue efforts. I thought of all the drinkable water these crews consumed could have been used to quench the thirst of Haitians dying from dehydration. Thankfully the GMA News team soon left after spending a self indulgent weekend at the airport. Their moral outrage registered and attempt at ratings grab accomplished. Their contribution to shedding light on the scope of this tragedy and placing it in a larger context of its meaning to the global community of nations was lost in deference to the tragedy’s emotional impact on GMA reporters. For GMA the subjective condition of the emotional distress of their media stars had become the story. Their viewers must have figured that if GMA’s News celebrities were hurting this story must be big.
CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta was an example of how a newsman became part of the story in a positive way. I recall with great admiration watching a camera crew following Dr. Gupta as he walked amidst the rubble of Port-Au-Prince. He learned of the location of a hospital and went to investigate how it was delivering services to the injured. Upon his arrival Dr. Gupta discovered the make shift hospital was little more then injured people being placed in the hallway of a building. The dead were being stacked outside by a wall surrounding the compound. The hospital had no doctors, nurses, beds or supplies. The facility lacked water to clean wounds or salve thirst. What the hospital did have was a constant stream of wounded arriving in greater numbers desperate for any type of care. The scale of the quake, the massive amounts of injured victims and the overwhelmed capacity of the hospitals ability to respond was reported in stark clarity.
Dr. Gupta was overwhelmed by parents cradling their broken children. Dr. Gupta a licensed medical doctor took off his correspondent hat and put on his stethoscope. He honored his Hippocratic Oath and started treating babies and the wounded with whatever he could cobble together. Dr. Gupta was no longer a journalist but was now a doctor. He asked that the cameras stop rolling so he could perform his duties as a doctor. I’ll never forget the look on Dr. Gupta’s face. It spoke volumes about the desperate conditions he was confronting and the firm resolve that he would perform his duties as a trained physician under trying almost impossible circumstances.
We could understand Dr. Gupta’s crossover from journalist to doctor. It was proper and correct response as a human being but as a journalist all objectivity had been lost and in many respects Dr. Gupta had become the story in a constellation of a million stories emanating from the epicenter of one of the great human tragedies of the past century. This is a departure from the norm of real time documentary reportage. I can’t tell you how many documentaries I came away from cursing the producers and cameramen for doing nothing to prevent the baby wildebeest from being consumed by the lion pack or for failing to offer a family of refugees in Darfur a bottle of water or a ride on their jeep to escape the marauding Janjaweed.
News Corps, network media division Fox News belies the myth of the monolithic liberal mainstream media and its claim of balance in its marketing handle. Fox News may offer a fair presentment of the news to its conservative viewership but its claim of balance that suggests the inclusion of a liberal perspective in their news product is specious.
Fox News really came of age following 9/11 and the growing conservative drift of the nation. Its useless to posit weather Fox News created the conservative drift or developed programming to market to this political demographic; but the political inclinations of Roger Ailes and Rupert Murdoch have always been decidedly conservative. At its founding in 1996, Fox News started differentiating itself from the liberal mainstream media by supporting the Republican impeachment drive of President Clinton, effectively setting the stage for its partisan approach to reporting the news. In many respects its unabashed partisanship was a game changer in how news and information was being packaged, positioned and delivered in the emerging narrow casting market paradigm. Its sentiment not very different from the golden days of yellow journalism practiced by William Randolph Hearst.
Liberals and progressives have criticized News Corp for its lack of objectivity and balance. Many believe it to be the official party organ of the Republican Party and its compromised coverage is more akin to propaganda then news. I believe this to be true as well. Fox News has countered that it provides both news and opinion. Fox News employs many of the leading conservative voices. Karl Rove, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee are senior GOP members on the payroll of Fox News. They regularly appear on shows hosted by Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity who are conservative celebrities in their own right. The trick is discerning what is news and what constitutes opinion and editorial content. The line that demarcates them is increasingly a fine one. Even the innocuous news blurbs scrolling along the bottom of the TV screen seep in partisanship. Some may report objective facts like the closing level of the Dow or the latest sports score. These little factoids appear alongside pieces that consistently reinforce the conservative credo of the network. Its also a practice for commentators like Karl Rove to opine on stories covered on news segments. The pundits impassioned analysis of the story leaves the listener little room to doubt the interpretation as a validation of the viewers conservative political sentiments and ideological disposition. The ability to distinguish fact from opinion becomes increasingly lost in these clouds of obfuscation.
As the model of creating, packaging and marketing partisan news the advent of Glenn Beck as a political entertainer is symptomatic of the maturation of the industry. Glenn Beck’s show is more of a political reeducation camp that tries to provide low information voters and political neophytes with a more robust framework to understand the history and philosophy of conservatism. Beck extends the Fox News portfolio of infotainment products.
Beck’s role in encouraging the formation of the Tea Party expands the footprint of News Corp. Some may consider this crosses the line into political activism but I believe it to be a highly developed form of call and response direct marketing. Beck’s incessant rants about the imminent collapse of American democracy, the downfall of free market capitalism and the advocacy of the purchase of gold to hedge against these terrible prospects has attracted the sponsorship of gold marketers and other fear merchants living large and minting major coin in the time of terror.
Fox is not alone in this sin. CNBC profited from the pre-crash market run-up and had a vested interest in fueling market speculation and excess. The business channel owned and operated by NBC took some heat on this issue in the wake of the market meltdown. During the market run-ups and the creation of the numerous market bubbles CNBC was taken to task for its roll as a biased shill in creating a risk averse mania that fed into the speculative orgy. The encouragement of reckless behavior would cost investors and Main Street citizens a good portion of their retirement savings. Jon Stewart took on CNBC celebrity Jim Cramer for his role in stoking unhealthy speculation. The claim of caveat emptor is not a sufficient disclaimer to absolve CNBC of this perceived wrong doing. Information and data is the fuel that powers the capital market engine and viewers perceived CNBC to be a critical channel for this type of decision support data and analysis. As animated red bulls flashed across the TV screen screaming “buy buy buy” the speculative urge feeding the demon greed of Cramer’s viewers jumped at the prospect to secure easy profits and pushed the execute button to route a flood of orders to E-Trade.
Media outlets were not alone in profiting from the conflict of interest in their business model. The rating agencies Moody’s, Standard and Poors and other issuers of financial health assessments were roundly criticized for a business model that accepted fees from companies to determine their investment ratings investors use to judge safety and soundness of the companies securities. Investment banking institutions like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley ran into trouble for trading securities that they advised their clients to hold in investment portfolios. Large commercial banks have also been called on the carpet for the inherent conflict of interest in their mortgage lending business that integrated mortgage underwriters, originators, servicers, securitizers and investors under a single roof.
Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission has given corporations a megaphone to direct enormous amounts of capital and influence on Americas political culture. The exponential growth of the political industrial complex places media companies on the cusp of an emerging market. News Corp occupies a well defined franchise in the vortex of this growth industry. News Corp will be the predominant media channel attracting politically sponsored advertising from 527 corporations to advocate issues central to the conservative agenda. The market for political theater is strong and growing and News Corp has one of the hottest theatrical properties in celebrities like Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck.
If Fox News bends and packages information with selected editing in support of political narrative; Andrew “NAACP” Breitbart and James “ACORN” O’Keefe edits news to create a false narrative to affirm ideology. The omnipresent multi-channel digital world and the need for consistent real time affirmation justifies entrapment and libel as fair game in the political narrative. The specious political ethics of radical entitlement, means justify ends, medium is the message and relativistic ethics is the next step of an ideologically mature ,technologically enabled infotainment industry. The self affirming echo chamber that verifies fact and swears to any truth is blessed with selective amnesia and a self correcting mechanism of a highly refined subjective fact checker informed by extreme prejudice.
Jon Stewart use of satire and exaggeration to make a lager point of clarified and reified truth is old school stuff. In the Age of the Avatar, the real, the imagined, the intended and the manifested get confused in the digital clouds of form, delivery and content. The medium is the message, the network is the computer and Jon Stewart’s Rally to Restore Sanity was a marketing event to stake a claim on the market of moderation. No doubt a highly educated discerning market segment with lots of disposable income. Its only downside its getting a little long in the tooth.
The Forth Estate is rapidly evolving due the dramatic changes in technology, market structure, business model and consumer consciousness. The role of the free press and the constitutional protections it enjoys in a democratic society is under siege and on the verge of bankruptcy. The New York Times, Chicago Tribune and LA Times are old media institutions struggling to stay financially solvent and culturally pertinent. Time will tell of their ability to evolve and create a sustainable business model that will be validated by a market economy. We have learned that truth, disclosure and transparency are not priceless assets but virtues that must support a sufficient p/e ratio to to survive in a capitalist economy.
The past few weeks we’ve had a few First Amendment martyrs. Rick Sanchez, Juan Williams and Keith Olbermann learned that the sword was more powerful then the pen. The more important lesson that managers could remove them on the whim of executive fiat if they failed to demonstrate restraint of pen and tongue. In actuality the removal of these gentlemen from the news desk was more of a business decision then a violation of their right of Free Speech.
As we enter the second decade of our two wars on terrorism even the embedded journalists rolling through the distressed hamlets of Iraq and Afghanistan are getting a bit war weary. Like a captive hostage the embeds could not help but to identify with their chauffeurs. The brave soldiers driving the Humvees’ were always in control of what the embeds saw, was responsible for their safety and quickly became the reporters best friend born of dependency, admiration and the comradeship that develops during war. Objective reportage was the first causality in this type of arrangement.
We need to take a cue from Jonathan Edwards. He is the real shaman of our time. Blessed with unique skills to help his audience to realize that self affirming connection is only possible by crossing over and taking suggestions from the well placed authorities residing in an unseen mysterious supernatural world.
You Tube Music Video: Tom Waits, Lie to Me
Risk: First Amendment, free speech
November 12, 2010 Posted by riskrapper | 9/11, banking, branding, business, Clinton, commercial, commodities, culture, democracy, democrats, economics, elections, government, history, investments, marketing, media, news, philosophy, politics, product, regulatory, sustainability, Tea Party, war | 9/11, Acheron, Afghanistan War, Andrew Breitbart, Bill O'Reilly, call and response direct marketing, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, CNBC, CNN, Crossing Over, Darfur, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, e trade, embedded journalists, FOX News, Glenn Beck, GMA, Goldman Sachs, Haiti earthquake, Hippocratic Oath, Humvee, Iraq War, James O'Keefe, Janjaweed, Jon Stewart, Jonathan Edwards, Karl Rove, Lie To Me, March to Restore Sanity, Mike Huckabee, Moody's, Morgan Stanley, News Corp, Port Au Prince, President Clinton, River Jordon, Robin Roberts, Roger Ailes, Rupert Murdoch, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Standard and Poors, Tea Party, The Forth Estate, Tom Waits, WE Cable Network, William Randolph Hearst, yellow journalism | Leave a comment
We are committed to meaningful, frequent and timely blog entries. It’s a tough assignment trying to fit it in with everything else that is necessary to sustain our business and our lives but we think it important. Like Narcissus we too have fallen in love with our own reflections.
The purpose of this Risk Rap is to examine risk and its impact on our culture and lives. This presents a broad enough pallet that pretty much gives us carte blanche to opine on all matters concerning politics, economics, art, religion and social issues.
Without fear or favor we will try to offer measured sober assessments of a world at risk and point to solutions to temper the potentially negative aspects of risk while enhancing the positive results and benefits of taking calculated risks. That is our fondest hope and fervent wish.
Thanks for visiting.
You Tube Music Video: John Coltrane, Dear Lord
Risk Rap Archives
- 101,470 hits
Search Risk Rap
Click a Tag9/11 Afghanistan audit risk banking bankruptcy Basel II Beach Boys Bruce Springsteen Bush China Civil Rights corporate governance Country Firsters credit crisis credit risk culture democracy Democratic Party economics EESA faith FASB FDIC FOX News Goldman Sachs GOP hedge funds holiday Industry Focus Issues inflation Iran IRS Israel jazz Jesus Christ Joe the Plumber LGBT manufacturing McCain New Jersey Obama offshore Pakistan Palestine Palin Paulson poem poetry politics President Obama private equity Profit|Optimizer psychology recession regulatory Republican Party reputation risk management Rush Limbaugh Sarah Palin Sean Hannity seasons SME SME Banking sovereign wealth funds Sum2 supply chain sustainability TARP tax audit Tea Party The Hamilton Plan unemployment US Constitution war
Site infoRisk Rap
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.