Risk Rap

Rapping About a World at Risk

Chris Cristie’s NJ Energy Plan: Is A Small Business Job Killer that Favors Big Fossil Fuel Energy Interests

Risk Rap returns from its hiatus with a guest blogger Meaghan McCallum.  This is a testimony opposing the Governor Christie’s administration revised 2011 Energy Master Plan.  

Thank you for the opportunity to have my voice heard.  My Name is Meaghan McCallum.  I’ve received my undergraduate degree from Montclair State University, educated in the state public school system, and work in the education field in New Jersey. I am a New Jersey citizen concerned for the future.  With this proposed reduction of Renewable goals that the revised Energy Master Plan establishes, the people of our great state are in jeopardy.  We need to be setting goals that propel us toward a cleaner, brighter future.  We need to take action now in order to build NJ’s economy, quality of life and support our local environment.  Lowering the renewable energy goal to 22.5% and defunding Renewable Energy programs that provide assistance to the public and private sectors to engage with Fossil Fuel industry is not only archaic but criminal.

In 2020, when the lack of vision expressed in Governor Chris Christie’s proposed 2011 revised EMP becomes reality, all of us will have to face our children and try to explain the unexplainable.  Why their rivers are polluted to the point of no recognition, why the air is choked and more hazardous than ever, and why more people, everywhere, are struggling to pay their power bills and simply put food on the table.  Why, we will be living in a dirty state tomorrow when solar and wind are here now and able to rebuild our infrastructure today.

For example, solar energy provides peak power during peak energy hours, which means relief when the grid is most stressed.  Ultimately, the use of solar energy as a primary source of power in state, local, public and private industry will decrease demand and ultimately save the citizen’s power costs dollars on the dollar. Compared with a cheap and easy “fix”, Fossil Fuels will deteriorate the state infrastructure and even further destroy the local economy, by outsourcing fuel contracts and employment to Pennsylvania, the US Midwest, and stimulating foreign markets.

So I ask; are we going to address our children a decade from today in a classroom powered by Renewable, clean energy, in a state where a cleaner, smarter, more efficient future exists?  Because lowering the bar on the Renewable Energy goal to the lowest possible percentage allowed by NJ law and refuting financial subsidiaries for Renewable Energies for a focus on dirty fuel in the name of profits and convenience is not cost effective and will quickly deplete our, the citizens, quality of life and the environment that we depend on.

The 2008 EMP goal to generate 30% of NJ’s total power needs from Renewable Energy sources is responsible for the economic growth and clean energy job creation in the state.  Key legislation was passed and generated over 2,000 clean energy businesses and over 25,000 clean industries employees in New Jersey.  The revised proposal will lower the goal to 22.5% and discourage investors, renewable energy companies and vital renewable energy technology from continued growth in New Jersey.  The revised plan relies on outdated and inflated numbers, and simply disregards proven science and the NJ public’s well-being.  This plan impacts us and it is imperative to demand that the current administration change priorities and address inequities.

Please visit www.state.nj.us/emp/ for information about the EMP and submit testimony to the Board of Public Utilities by August 11 to oppose this dirty energy plan.

 UPCOMING HEARINGS:

 Trenton — Wednesday, August 3rd:

State House Annex
Committee Room 11
125 West State Street
Trenton, NJ Get a map!
1PM – 5PM

Pomona — Thursday, August 11th

Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
Campus Center
Vera King Farris Drive
Pomona, NJ Get a map!
1PM – 5PM

CONTACT:

Beyond Coal Campaign
Sierra Club

Risk: environment, economy, jobs, small business

Advertisements

July 29, 2011 Posted by | coal fired plants, ecological, energy, environment, republicans | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leaky Reactors, Cyber Terror and Police States

This is how the world ends
This is how the world ends
This is how the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper
The Hallow Men TS Elliot

A few interesting  news items recently passed without much notice.  Two nuclear reactors located in the Northeast had to be  brought offline due to operational failures.  The Vermont Yankee reactor sprang a leak and had to be shut down.  The other incident occurred at the thirty six year old Indian Point reactor located about twenty miles north of New York City.  The cause of the problem at Indian Point was a transformer fire.  Both reactors  are owned and operated by Entergy and mirror similar problems at the Excelon operated Oyster Creek reactor located in south central New Jersey.

These incidents are endemic to aging nuclear power facilities.  These plants came on line during the the 1970’s and are now approaching the half century mark of service.  When these plants were commissioned it was believed they would have a shelf life of 40 years.   As the expected useful life span of these facilities approach regulators routinely grant extensions to the operators.  Operating these facilities past that point heighten potential risk factors.  As nuclear reactors age, the stress on these complex systems and containment facilities raise risk factors heightening the potential of system failure that lead to catastrophic events.

Leaky plumbing at the Oyster Creek nuclear plant is the culprit in poisoning the Cohansey Aquifer with 180,000 gallons of tritium contaminated water.  Regulators and environmental officials assert that the level of radio active isotopes in the water supply that serves South Jersey and parts of Philadelphia is well within acceptable levels for human consumption.  I guess that all depends on your definition of human; but I and many others remain skeptical on the subject of drinking radioactive laced water.

The aging nuclear infrastructure of the United States is a growing cause for concern.  The nuclear power industry was halted in its tracks in the 1980’s by a strong No Nukes environmental movement.  At the time it was generally understood that the cost of catastrophic risk and the industries inability to solve the long term problem of disposal and management of nuclear waste turned the public against the industry.

The Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania and the disastrous meltdown at Chernobyl in the Russian Caucuses led to a moratorium on new plant construction in the United States leading to the actual abandonment of plant construction in the Washington and New York.  It created a capital market crisis as the fear of defaults on WPPSS  revenue bonds spread to cast long shadows on the entire Muni Bond market.  The state of  New York stepped in to purchase the facilities of Long Island Power in order to make bondholders of the closed facility whole with tax payer money.  It was kind of like socialism for investors.

While most of the world has continued to build nuclear plants to address growing energy needs; the United States has not built a nuclear plant since the 1980’s and has lagged the world in using nuclear power to address energy needs. Sentiment on the desirability of nuclear power is beginning to change.  The Pickens Plan, former VP Dick Cheney’s secret meetings to develop a national energy strategy, the Gulf Oil Spill, the need to reduce dependence on foreign oil and the growing acceptance that the burning of fossil fuels is slowly cooking the planet has placed nuclear power back on the table as a viable component of America’s energy portfolio.

China is committed to building 100 nuclear power plants to wean itself from its crippling dependence on coal.  The United States is charging hard to keep up with its fast growing Asian competitor in a 21st Century nuclear power race.  The aggressive pursuit of nuclear plant development will increase the power and control of corporate entities charged with their construction, management and on going administration.  To accomplish a dramatic build-out in nuclear infrastructure large areas of  land situated near a plentiful water supply will need to be secured.   Environmental impacts, regulatory oversight and public transparency will be sacrificed at the alter of cost efficiency, expedience in implementation and security to protect the vulnerable facilities against the pervasive armies of terrorists that lurk in the shadows near every nuclear plant.

The controversy surrounding the collusion of government and business to exploit the Marcellus Shale natural gas vein is an instructive model of what we can expect from the stakeholders pursuing an aggressive campaign to develop Americas nuclear power infrastructure.  The dismissal of regulatory controls, the eminent domain of corporate interests, the opaque wall that shrouds risks factors and hides the environmental degradation resulting from the practice of fracking and the sacrifice of watersheds and aquifers to the expeditious extraction of natural gas are some of the documented behaviors of  a wanton corporate will imposed on the body politic.  Tragically this near sighted perspective willfully sacrifices the sustainable ecology of communities to the sole purpose of the profitable extraction of resources to serve shareholders of private corporations.   The nature of the nuclear beast will require that its interests be enforced by courts of law guided by extreme prejudice and protected by police battalions, state  guard units and private security groups in the name of national security interests.

The recently discovered Stuxnet computer virus is an indication of how the stakes are being raised in the nuclear power shell game.  The launch of a successful cyber attack on a nuclear facility anywhere in the world is a real game changer.  Self deluded uber patriots act more  like real pinheads if they believe that the destruction of Iran’s nuclear power capability is a harbinger for Middle East peace or enhances the   security of either Israel or the United States.  A nuclear event in Iran or North Korea are real game changers for the course of human history and the well being of  humanity. A clandestine service that can take out Iranian nuclear reactors can also be deployed to take out a reactor that is twenty miles north of New York City.  Or consider the consequences of a summer heat wave ravaging the citizens Philadelphia dying of thirst because the water supply is contaminated with radiation.  The extent of civil unrest would be extreme overwhelming the local law enforcement and judicial capabilities.  If these bleak scenarios come to pass,  Americans will be pining away for the good old days when a quick feel up at the airport by a TSA gendarme is fondly recalled like a high school make out session.  The pernicious yoke of marshal law under the nuclear challenged corporate security state will be incessant in practice and swift, sure and dire in its execution.

You Tube music video: No Nukes Concert 1979: Doobie Brothers Taking it to The Streets

Risk: democracy, energy policy, nuclear power, civil liberties

 

November 22, 2010 Posted by | community, culture, democracy, disaster planning, ecological, energy, environment, government, military, nuclear, regulatory, risk management | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment