The world is a great big database and algorithmic wizards and mad data scientists are burning the midnight oil to mine the perplexing infinities of ubiquitous data points. Their goal is to put data to use to facilitate better governance, initiate pinpoint marketing campaigns, pursue revelatory academic research and improve the quality of service public agencies deliver to protect and serve communities. The convergence of Big Data, Cloud Computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) make this possible.
The earth is the mother of all relational databases. It’s six billion inhabitants track many billions of real time digital footprints across the face of the globe each and every day. Some footprints are readily apparent and easy to see. Facebook likes, credit card transactions, name and address lists, urgent Tweets and public records sparkle like alluvial diamonds; all easily plucked by data aggregators and sold to product marketers at astonishing profit margins. Other data points are less apparent, hidden or derived in the incessant hum of the ever listening, ever recording global cybersphere. These are the digital touch points we knowingly and unknowingly create with our interactions with the world wide web and the machines that live there.
It is estimated that there is over 20 billion smart machines that are fully integrated into our lives. These machines stay busy creating digital footprints; adding quantitative context to the quality of the human condition. EZ Passes, RFID tags, cell phone records, location tracking, energy meters, odometers, auto dashboard idiot lights, self diagnostic fault tolerant machines, industrial process controls, seismographic, air and water quality apparatuses and the streaming CBOT digital blips flash the milliseconds of a day in the life of John Q. Public. Most sentient beings pay little notice, failing to consider that someone somewhere is planting the imprints of our daily lives in mammoth disk farms. The webmasters, data engineers and information scientists are collecting, collating, aggregating, scoring and analyzing these rich gardens of data to harvest an accurate psychographic portrait of modernity.
The IoT is the term coined to describe the new digital landscape we inhabit. The ubiquitous nature of the internet, the continued rationalization of the digital economy into the fabric of society and the absolute dependency of daily life upon it, require deep consideration how it impacts civil liberties, governance, cultural vibrancy and economic well being.
The IoT is the next step in the development of the digital economy. By 2025 it is estimated that IoT will drive $6 Trillion in global economic activity. This anoints data and information as the loam of the modern global economy; no less significant than the arrival of discrete manufacturing at the dawn of industrial capitalism.
The time may come when a case may be made that user generated data is a commodity and should be considered a public domain natural resource; but today it is the province of digirati shamans entrusted to interpret the Rosetta Stones, gleaning deep understanding of the current reality while deriving high probability predictive futures. IoT is one of the prevailing drivers of global social development.
There is another critical economic and socio-political driver of the global economy. Small Mid-Sized Enterprises (SME) are the cornerstone of job creation in developed economies. They form the bedrock of subsistence and economic activity in lesser developed countries (LDC). They are the dynamic element of capitalism. SME led by courageous risk takers are the spearhead of capital formation initiatives. Politicians, bureaucrats and business pundits extol their entrepreneurial zeal and hope to channel their youthful energy in service to local and national political aspirations. The establishment of SME is a critical macroeconomic indicator of a country’s economic health and the wellspring of social wealth creation.
The World Bank/ IFC estimates that over 130 million registered SME inhabit the global economy. The definition of an SME varies by country. Generally an SME and MSME (Micro Small Mid Sized Enterprises) are defined by two measures, number of employees or annual sales. Micro enterprises are defined as employing less than 9 employees, small up to 100 employees and medium sized enterprises anywhere from 200 to 500 employees. Defining SMEs by sales scale in a similar fashion.
Every year millions of startup businesses replace the millions that have closed. The world’s largest economy United States boasts over 30 million SME and every year over one million small businesses close. The EU and OECD countries report similar statistics of the preponderance of SME and numbers of business closures.
The SME is a dynamic non homogeneous business segment. It is highly diverse in character, culture and business model heavily colored by local influence and custom. SME is overly sensitive to macroeconomic risk factors and market cyclicality. Risk is magnified in the SME franchise due to high concentration of risk factors. Over reliance on a limited set of key clients or suppliers, product obsolescence, competitive pressures, force majeure events, key employee risk, change management and credit channel dependencies are glaring risk factors magnified by business scale and market geographics.
In the United States, during the banking crisis the Federal Reserve was criticized for pursuing policies that favored large banking and capital market participants while largely ignoring SME. To mitigate contagion risk, The Federal Reserve quickly acted to pump liquidity into the banking sector to buttress the capital structure of SIFI (Systemically Important Financial Institutions). It was thought that a collateral benefit would be the stimulation of SME lending. This never occurred as SBA backed loans nosedived. Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner implemented the TARP and TALF programs to further strengthen the capital base of distressed banks as former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke pursued Quantitative Easing to transfer troubled mortgage backed securities onto Uncle Sams balance sheet to relieve financial institutions of these troubled assets. Some may argue that President Obama’s The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) helped the SME sector. The $800 billion stimulus was one third tax cuts, one third cash infusion to local governments and one third capital expenditures aimed at shovel ready infrastructure improvement projects. The scale of the ARRA was miniscule as compared to support rendered to banks and did little to halt the deteriorating macroeconomic conditions of the collapsing housing market, ballooning unemployment and rising energy prices severely stressing SME.
The EU offered no better. As the PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Spain) economies collapsed the European Central Bank forced draconian austerity measures on national government expenditures undermining key SME market sensitivities. On both sides of the Atlantic, the perception of a bifurcated central banking policy that favored TBTF Wall Street over the needs of an atomized SME segment flourished. The wedge between the speculative economy of Wall Street and the real economy on Main Street remains a festering wound.
In contrast to the approach of western central bankers, Asian Tigers, particularly Singapore have created a highly supportive environment for the incubation and development of SME. Banks offer comprehensive portfolios of financial products and SME advisory services. Government legislative programs highlight incubation initiatives linked to specific industry sectors. Developed economies have much to learn from these SME friendly market leaders.
The pressing issues concerning net neutrality, ecommerce tax policies, climate change and the recognition of Bitcoin as a valid commercial specie are critical developments that goes to the heart of a healthy global SME community. These emerging market events are benevolent business drivers for SME and concern grows that legislative initiatives are being drafted to codify advantages for politically connected larger enterprises.
Many view this as a manifestation of a broken political system, rife with protections of large well financed politically connected institutions. Undermining these entrenched corporate interests is the ascending digital paradigm promising to dramatically alter business as usual politics. Witness the role of social media in the Arab Spring, Barack Obama’s 2008 election or the decapitalization of the print media industry as clear signals of the the passing away of the old order of things. Social networking technologies and the democratization of information breaks down the ossified monopolies of knowledge access. These archaic ramparts are being gleefully overthrown by open collaborative initiatives levelling the playing field for all market participants.
This is where SMEIoT neatly converges. To effectively serve an efficient market, transparency and a contextual understanding of its innate dynamics are critical preconditions to market participation. The incubation of SME and the underwriting of capital formation initiatives from a myriad of providers will occur as information standards provide a level of transparency that optimally aligns risk and investment capital. SMEIoT will provide the insights to the sector for SME to grow and prosper while industry service providers engage SME within the context of a cooperative economic non-exploitative relationship.
This series will examine SME and how IoT will serve to transform and incubate the sector. We’ll examine the typology of the SME ecosystem, its risk characteristics and features. We’ll propose a metadata framework to model SME descriptors, attributes, risk factors and a scoring methodology. We’ll propose an SME portal, review the mission of Big Data and its indispensable role to create cooperative economic frameworks within the SME ecosystem. Lastly we’ll review groundbreaking work social scientists, legal scholars and digital frontier activists are proposing to address best governance practices and ethical considerations of Big Data collection, the protection of privacy rights, informed consent, proprietary content and standards of accountability.
SMEIoT coalesces at the intersection of social science, commerce and technology. History has aligned SMEIot building blocks to create the conditions for this exciting convergence. Wide participation of government agencies, academicians, business leaders, scientists and ethicists will be required to make pursuit of this science serve the greatest good.
This is the first in a series of articles on Big Data and SMEIoT . It originally appeared in Daftblogger eJournal. Next piece in series is scheduled to appear on Daftblogger eJournal within the next two weeks.
#smeiot #metasme #sum2llc #sme #office365 #mobileoffice #TARP #capitalformation #IoT #internetofthings #OECD #TBTF #Bitcoin #psychographics #smeportals #bigdata #informedconsent
July 9, 2014 Posted by riskrapper | banking, Bernanke, commerce, commercial, credit crisis, economics, ethics, Internet of Things, IoT, politics, risk management, SME, SMEIOT, Sum2, sustainability, TALF, TARP, Treasury | #bigdata, #Bitcoin, #capitalformation, #informedconsent, #internetofthings, #IoT, #metasme, #mobileoffice, #office365, #psychographics, #smeiot, #smeportals, #sum2llc, OECD, SME, TARP, TBTF | Leave a comment
Goldman Sachs’ CEO Lloyd Blankfein and his largest investor, The Wizard of Omaha, Warren Buffett , descended from the mystical heights of Valhalla with some startling news. They were bearing a new mythical golden ring. As they held the ring aloft they made a bold proclamation. They would embark on one of the grandest social entrepreneurial programs of all time by offering some of the rings precious power, about $500 million worth, to capital starved small and mid-size enterprises (SMEs). The 10,000 Small Businesses Initiative will distribute $100 million per year over the next five years to SMEs through Community Development Financial Institutions.
These lords of commerce have heard the cries from endangered SMEs. In their infinite wisdom Blankfein and Buffet understand that the real economy needs to resuscitate and incubate the critical SME segment as an absolute prerequisite to a vibrant economic recovery. The buzz about this news in the marketplace ranged from cynical suspicion at one extreme to puzzled bemusement and ecstatic aplomb at the other.
What motivated Goldman to announce this initiative is an interesting question. Was it guilt, greed or a sense of corporate social responsibility? Some suggest it is a master PR move to counter a growing public perception that Goldman Sachs, the poster child of government favoritism and bailout largess, has leveraged its unfair advantage to achieve historic levels of profitability. Thus enabling management to pay obscene bonuses to company employees. But capital has no psyche, and half a billion dollars is a tall bill to underwrite absolution for some phantom form of guilt. True to its nature, capital always seeks a place where it will find its greatest return. Goldman and Buffett are casting some major bread on the receding waters of a distressed economy. As its foretold in the Good Book , doing God’s work will produce a tenfold return. If the Bible’s math is correct, thats a lot of manna that will rain down from heaven for the shareholders of Goldman Sachs and Berkshire Hathaway. Looks like our modern day version of Moses and Aaron have done it again. Leading their investors across the dangerous waters of the global economy to live in the promised land of happy shareholders.
As one of the world’s preeminent investment banks and purveyor of capitalist virtues, company shareholders must be questioning how Goldman’s managers will realize a return on this investment? Has management examined the potential corporate and societal moral hazards surrounding the program? Surely shareholders have asked when they expect to be compensated for this significant outlay of capital. The desire to realize gain is a more plausible motivator and makes more sense for an enterprise like Goldman and the storied investment Wizard from Omaha.
Its wise to ascribe the best intentions and virtuous motivations to actions that we may not fully understand. This program should be viewed as a seminal event in the history of corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. Its important to understand that institutions that practice corporate social responsibility do not engage it solely as a philanthropic endeavor. Indeed, the benefits of good corporate citizenship pays multidimensional dividends. All ultimately accrue to the benefit of company shareholders and the larger community of corporate stakeholders.
Goldman’s move to walk the point of a capital formation initiative for SMEs seeks to mitigate macroeconomic risk factors that are prolonging the recession and pressuring Goldman’s business. Goldman needs a vibrant US economy if it is to sustain its profitability, long term growth and global competitiveness. Goldman needs a strong regional and local banking sector to support its securitization, investment banking and corporate finance business units. Healthy SMEs are a critical component to a healthy commercial banking sector. Goldman recent chartering as an FDIC bank holding company may also be a factor to consider. This SME lending initiative will provide interesting insights into the dynamics of a market space and potential lines of business that are relatively new to Goldman Sachs. This initiative might presage a community banking acquisition program by Goldman. At the very least the community banking sector is plagued with over capacity is in dire need of rationalization. Goldman’s crack team of corporate finance and M&A professionals expertise would be put to good use here.
Goldman’s action to finance SMEs will also serve to incubate a new class of High Net Worth (HNW) investors. Flush with cash from successful entrepreneurial endeavors, the nouveau riche will be eager to deploy excess capital into equities and bonds, hedge funds and private equity partnerships. Healthy equity markets and a growing Alternative Investment Management market is key to a healthy Goldman business franchise.
Community banks, principal lenders to SMEs are still reeling from the credit crisis are concerned about troubled assets on their balance sheets. Bankers can’t afford more write downs on non-performing loans and remain highly risk adverse to credit default exposures. Local banks have responded by drastically reducing credit risk to SMEs by curtailing new lending activity. The strain of a two-year recession and limited credit access has taking its toll on SMEs. The recession has hurt sales growth across all market segments causing SMEs to layoff employees or shut down driving unemployment rates ever higher. Access to this sector would boost Goldman’s securitization and restructuring advisory businesses positioning it to deepen its participation in the PPIP and TALF programs.
The financial condition of commercial and regional banks are expected to remain stressed for the foreseeable future. Community banks have large credit exposures to SME and local commercial real estate. Consumer credit woes and high unemployment rates will generate continued losses from credit cards and auto loans. Losses from commercial real estate loans due to high vacancy rates are expected to create significant losses for the sector.
Reduced revenue, protracted softness in the business cycle and closed credit channels are creating perfect storm conditions for SME’s. Bank’s reluctance to lend and the high cost of capital from other alternative credit channels coupled with weak cash flows from declining sales are creating liquidity problems for many SMEs. Its a growing contagion of financial distress. This contagion could infect Goldman and would have a profound impact on the company’s financial health.
The 10,000 Businesses initiative will strengthen the free flow of investment capital to finance national economic development and empower SMEs. It strengthens free market capitalism and has the potential to pool, unleash and focus investment capital into a strategic market segment that has no access to public equity and curtailed lines of traditional bank credit. The 10,000 Businesses initiative will encourage wider participation by banking and private equity funds. In the aggregate, this will help to achieve strategic objectives, build wealth and realize broader goals to assure sustainable growth and global competitiveness. All to the benefit of Goldman Sachs’ shareholders and it global investment banking franchise.
Sum2 believes that corporate social responsibility is a key tenet of a sound practice program. Goldman Sach’s has always been a market leader. We salute Goldman Sachs’ initiative and welcome its success.
In September of 2008, Sum2 announced The Hamilton Plan calling for the founding of an SME Development Bank (SDB). The SDB would serve as an aggregator of capital from numerous stakeholders to focus capital investment for SME manufactures. More on the Hamilton Plan can be read here: SME Development Bank.
Risk: SME, bank, recession, unemployment, credit, private equity
You Tube Music: 10,000 Manaics, Natalie Merchant: Dust Bowl
November 20, 2009 Posted by riskrapper | banking, corporate social responsibility, Hamilton Plan, hedge funds, investments, off shore, PPIP, private equity, Profit|Optimizer, recession, reputation, reputational risk, SME, sound practices, Sum2, TALF, unemployment | AIM, banking, Berkshire Hathaway, commercial banks, community banks, Community Development Financial Institution, credit, credit risk, economics, FDIC, Götterdämmerung, Goldman Sachs, hedge funds, HNW Investors, Lloyd Blankfein, M&A, macroeconomic risk, Moses and Aaron, PPIP, private equity, private equity | 10000 Small Businesses, securitization, SME, SME Development Bank, TALF, The Hamilton Plan, The Wizard of Omaha, Valhalla, Warren Buffett, Wizard of Omaha | Leave a comment
We are committed to meaningful, frequent and timely blog entries. It’s a tough assignment trying to fit it in with everything else that is necessary to sustain our business and our lives but we think it important. Like Narcissus we too have fallen in love with our own reflections.
The purpose of this Risk Rap is to examine risk and its impact on our culture and lives. This presents a broad enough pallet that pretty much gives us carte blanche to opine on all matters concerning politics, economics, art, religion and social issues.
Without fear or favor we will try to offer measured sober assessments of a world at risk and point to solutions to temper the potentially negative aspects of risk while enhancing the positive results and benefits of taking calculated risks. That is our fondest hope and fervent wish.
Thanks for visiting.
You Tube Music Video: John Coltrane, Dear Lord
Risk Rap Archives
- 101,539 hits
Search Risk Rap
Click a Tag9/11 Afghanistan audit risk banking bankruptcy Basel II Beach Boys Bruce Springsteen Bush China Civil Rights corporate governance Country Firsters credit crisis credit risk culture democracy Democratic Party economics EESA faith FASB FDIC FOX News Goldman Sachs GOP hedge funds holiday Industry Focus Issues inflation Iran IRS Israel jazz Jesus Christ Joe the Plumber LGBT manufacturing McCain New Jersey Obama offshore Pakistan Palestine Palin Paulson poem poetry politics President Obama private equity Profit|Optimizer psychology recession regulatory Republican Party reputation risk management Rush Limbaugh Sarah Palin Sean Hannity seasons SME SME Banking sovereign wealth funds Sum2 supply chain sustainability TARP tax audit Tea Party The Hamilton Plan unemployment US Constitution war
Site infoRisk Rap
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.